Forklifts & Powered Industrial Trucks: Catastrophic Patterns and Key Evidence
Forklifts and other powered industrial trucks (PITs) are indispensable and unforgiving. When something goes wrong, the result is often a crushing injury, traumatic amputation, brain or spinal trauma, or death. Understanding the recurring patterns and locking down the right evidence early is the difference between an avoidable âoperator errorâ narrative and a provable case.

The safety baseline (and why it matters in litigation)
- OSHA 29 CFR 1910.178 governs design, maintenance, and use of PITs, including operator training, daily examinations, travel practices, dock safety, and more. Itâs your primary regulatory framework.
- Operator training/certification is mandatory; employers must ensure competency and document training and evaluation. Failures here are common and discoverable.
- Daily/shift inspections are required; defects must be reported and corrected before the truck is placed in service. Gaps in checklists and repairs often prove systemic negligence.
- Securing trailers at docks (brakes set and wheel chocks) is expressly required when loading/unloading. Trailer roll-away and separation events frequently trace back to basic noncompliance.
- Hazard locations and truck âtypeâ designations (D, E, EE, EX, LP, etc.) must match the environment (e.g., flammable vapors). Mismatches support negligent operations claims.
- Consensus standards:
- ANSI/ITSDF B56.1 (low and high lift trucks) addresses design, operation, and maintenance expectations used by experts and courts as evidence of industry consensus.
- NFPA 505 addresses fire/explosion hazards and appropriate truck classifications by areaâuseful in hazardous location claims.
Catastrophic injury patterns youâll see again and again
- Tip-overs (lateral or longitudinal), often with the operator crushed after jumping – the leading cause of forklift fatalities. Contributing factors: speed, turning with an elevated load, off-center loads, poor surfaces, or ramps.
- Pedestrian struck-by/pin-between incidents in mixed traffic areas with blind corners, narrow aisles, or obstructed views. (BLS trend data also highlight frequent struck-by and falling-object deaths.)
- Falls from elevated forks/work platforms (improper work platforms, lack of fall protection, or bypassed interlocks).
- Dock run-offs/vehicle separation during loading and unloading.
- Load drop/overturning loads due to capacity, center of gravity, or attachment errors.
- CO exposure or battery-charging hazards in poorly ventilated areas.
Evidence to preserve in the first 14 days
Vehicles & equipment
- Make/model/SN; hours; attached implements; rated capacity + load center; condition of seat belt/restraint, overhead guard, load backrest, tires, steering, brakes, lights, horns. Photograph the belt buckle (locking function), alarm indicators, and any taped-over sensors.
Records & data
- Operator training/certification files; evaluation records; refresher training triggers (near-misses, collisions, assignment changes).
- Pre-shift/daily inspection checklists; work orders; out-of-service tags; maintenance/vendor logs.
- Dock safety policies and compliance records (wheel chock policies, vehicle restraints, communication lights).
- CCTV/video and forklift-mounted camera feeds; warehouse maps; traffic management plans; pedestrian aisle markings.
- ESI/telematics: Many fleets use systems that log impacts, access control (operator log-ins), speed settings, and utilization. Request raw data and admin dashboards.
Scene documentation
- Aisle width, turning radii, grade/ramps, floor conditions, lighting, mirror placement, signage; sightline photos at operator eye level (seated and standing).
- Dock alignment; restraint status; wheel chock placement; plate/leveler position.
Witness questions that surface systemic failures
Operator
- Training received on this truck/attachment? Frequency of refresher? Any prior near-misses or impacts? (Check against telematics.)
- Seat belt and restraint usage culture. Were interlocks present or alarms disabled?
- Typical travel speed; horn use at cross-aisles; visibility with the last load.
Supervisor/Safety manager
- Who verifies daily inspections and pulls defective trucks from service? Turnaround time for repairs?
- How are pedestrians separated from PIT traffic? Blind-corner controls (mirrors, convex mirrors, mirrorsâ condition), speed limits, and enforcement.
- Dock securing procedures and audits; any prior trailer movement events.
Third parties
- Staffing agency training and assignment controls.
- Service/maintenance vendor response times, parts quality, and whether safety-critical defects were deferred.
- Property owner/host employer control over traffic plans, signage, and dock equipment – key for multi-employer exposure.
Liability theories & common defendants
- Employer/host employer: negligent training, supervision, and traffic management; failure to secure docks; use of improper truck type in hazardous locations.
- Staffing agency: negligent placement/training of operators.
- Premises owner/GC: inadequate pedestrian controls, poor lighting, unsafe layouts; multi-employer doctrine (creating/controlling/correcting employers may be cited).
- Product liability: design/warning defects (stability, visibility, restraint systems, optional speed limiting/zone control); inadequate instructions.
- Maintenance/vendor negligence: failure to correct known brake/steering/steer-axle/chain defects or to keep restraint systems operable.
Expert team that moves the needle
- Accident reconstruction (stability dynamics, speed, stopping distance)
- Forklift/warehouse safety engineer (OSHA/B56/NFPA application; traffic and dock design)
- Human factors (visibility, warnings, alarm effectiveness)
- Industrial hygienist (CO/battery charging ventilation)
- Biomechanics/vocational/economics (causation, life care, lost earnings)
Defense themesâand how to counter them
- âPure operator error.â Recenter on employer controls: training quality, refresher triggers after near-misses, speed management, and visibility mitigations required by policy and consensus practice.
- âNo defect – just misuse.â Examine whether safer feasible designs (restraint interlocks, zone-based speed limiting, proximity alerts) were available and known to the manufacturer and purchaser. Telematics and OEM offerings help show feasibility.
- âWe followed the rules.â Compare written policies to actual compliance: missing daily inspections, out-of-service violations, unsecured trailers, operators uncertified on the specific class/attachment.
Injured in a Forklift or Powered Industrial Truck Incident?
If you or a loved one suffered a catastrophic injury or a wrongful death involving a forklift or PIT, McEldrew Purtell can help. Our team moves quickly to preserve evidence, work with OSHA/ANSI experts, and build a case that holds the right parties accountable.
Free, confidential consultation. No fee unless we recover.
Call: 215-545-8800
Email: te**@*************ll.com
Or send us a message through our websiteâs contact form to speak with an attorney today.